Skip to main content

Rudy Giuliani and his Wives

Let's start with Rudy Giuliani's current wife, Judith.  Rudy recently posted a comment, "It is with great sadness I can confirm that Judith and I are divorcing.  We hope to do this as amicably as possible, and hope that people will respect the privacy of our children at this time.  In these divorce situations, you cannot place blame, It is 50/50, there are problems on both sides."

Judith and Rudy were married in 2003 at a wedding now President Donald Trump attended.  Two years later, Rudy attended Trump's wedding to current wife Melania.

The interesting part about his current marriage to Judith is that it was born out of an affair.  Giuliani divorced his second wife, Donna Hanover, in 2002, after being separated for 2 years because of Giuliani's extra marital affair with his now wife Judith. 

It seems that Judith has requested a divorce from Rudy now for the same reason.  Rudy had an extra marital affair with a married New Hampshire hospital administrator named Maria Rosa Ryan.  Interestingly enough, even after Rudy and Ryan were spotted getting comfortable at a resort hotel just 5 days before Judith and her husband separated, Giuliani denies the affair with the married Mrs. Ryan.  He simply said that he and Ryan had dinner and watched a movie at the posh spa, but claimed he was already "in effect separated" from Judith at the time. 

His wife Judith replied in an angry statement, "My husband's denial of the affair with the married Mrs. Ryan is as false as his claim that we were separated when he took up with her."  It sounds to me like Judith doesn't agree at all with Rudy's 50/50 blame comment either.

So Rudy's second marriage ended because he had an affair, his third marriage is ending because he had an affair...but we haven't talked at all about his first marriage...and that is where things get a bit weird.

Rudy Giuliani was married for the first time to a woman named Regina Peruggi.  They were married from 1968 to 1982, so it was a long marriage that resulted in no children.  Here's where things get interesting.  In August of 1982, Rudy Giuliani filed for legal separation from Regina Peruggi, and a civil divorce was issued by the end of that year.  A Roman Catholic Church annulment of the Giuliani-Peruggi marriage was granted at the end of 1983 on the grounds that they had not obtained a church dispensation for SECOND COUSINS to marry.  Giuliani later said he had believed they were THIRD COUSINS. 

So Rudy Giuliani married someone he had known all of his life, and who he knew he was related to.  He claims he thought Regina was a third cousin, although she was a second cousin.  Interesting stuff.

Now, I wanted to cover all of this for one reason.  Rudy Giuliani has been all over the news in the past weeks talking about Stormy Daniels and how she has no credibility because of the occupation she chose in life.  The horrible comments that Rudy has stood behind since making them really hold no weight when you look at Rudy's personal past.  He is a philanderer and a cheater, and two of his three marriages have ended or are ending because of extra marital affairs.  One could speculate that he was caught with Mrs. Ryan recently, but chances are that she was not the only one over the years. 

This is the person the President of the United States has out there standing up for him in the media circuit.  This man is sick, disrespectful, and after hearing much of what he has had to say over the past months, probably a bit nuts. 

The occupation someone chooses in life doesn't take away from who they are as human beings.  Because Stormy Daniels is an adult film actress makes her no less of a person than anyone else...including Rudy Giuliani.  In fact, the amount of strength and courage it has probably taken her to stand up and make this all public over the past many months tells me that Stormy is a very strong person, and they way she has handled it all adds to her credibility.  What takes away from someone's credibility is when they lie and mislead.

Rudy, you push conspiracy theories that aren't based on any factual information, and you push them as facts, even after they are completely debunked.  You still talk about SPYGATE, even though that was a Trump created term to describe something that DIDN'T HAPPEN.  You still talk about it as if it did, just like your buddy the President.  For you to go out and talk about people like Stormy Daniels as you do is laughable. 

Wake up and look in the mirror, and you will see the only horrible person you need to worry about...yourself.

DUNK

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trump and the DOJ Trying to Silence Mueller...

Mueller is set to sit in front of Congress on Wednesday this week and answer questions regarding the Mueller Investigation.  The DOJ, and organization that is supposed to look out for the best interests of America but has recently decided to become Trump's personal Law Firm, has sent correspondence to Mueller about what he can and cannot answer. For instance, you have the question of the 10 documented cases of obstruction in volume 2 of the report.  Mueller made it clear that he was bound by DOJ policy and could not indict a sitting president.  One very important question the Congressional Leadership will likely ask is, "If Donald Trump wasn't the sitting President, would you have indicted him based on the amount of evidence in the report?"  That question in every respect is fair.  You are asking the head of an investigation if they would have indicted someone had an arbitrary roadblock not been in place.  I say arbitrary roadblock because the policy is...

Truth Matters

If there is one thing I need to keep reminding myself in today's world of political discourse, it is that Truth Matters. At any point in time I can turn on (insert news agency here) News and what I see is vastly different depending upon the news agency I watch.  Why is that?  Every mainstream news organization is bias in some way based upon who runs or owns the news organization.  Don't get me wrong; there are great and impartial journalists and agencies out there, but we are talking in aggregate and not about individuals or one-off agencies. When an issue like immigration is at the forefront of political discourse you can tune into CNN, MSNBC, and FOX and likely get three completely different takes on immigration.  Each news organization tailors their message to speak to what they feel is their viewer base and potential viewer base. That in and of itself is understood by people who follow politics on a regular basis and dig through multiple news sources in ord...

Why does it have to be one way or the other?

I remember a time when I could sit and talk politics and religion with people and have good, productive debates.  The debates were not hateful or one sided, and only rational personal opinions and actual facts were used during the discussions.  They included each person stating their points and making their case, and then each side came to compromises that allowed for solutions that would be good for both parties in the debate.  How did we come to a time in our country's history where we are so vehemently divided on every issue that nothing beneficial to the majority of the American populous or the stability of the country itself can be accomplished?  I am going to state some facts in the next paragraphs.  They may be facts you don't agree with, but they are facts none-the-less.  Those of you on the Right who believe your party's platform has all of the answers to the issues and problems this country faces...you are wrong.  Those of ...