Skip to main content

Trump and the DOJ Trying to Silence Mueller...

Mueller is set to sit in front of Congress on Wednesday this week and answer questions regarding the Mueller Investigation.  The DOJ, and organization that is supposed to look out for the best interests of America but has recently decided to become Trump's personal Law Firm, has sent correspondence to Mueller about what he can and cannot answer.

For instance, you have the question of the 10 documented cases of obstruction in volume 2 of the report.  Mueller made it clear that he was bound by DOJ policy and could not indict a sitting president.  One very important question the Congressional Leadership will likely ask is, "If Donald Trump wasn't the sitting President, would you have indicted him based on the amount of evidence in the report?" 

That question in every respect is fair.  You are asking the head of an investigation if they would have indicted someone had an arbitrary roadblock not been in place.  I say arbitrary roadblock because the policy is really not a policy.  It is a memo from decades ago.  Regardless, the question is very fair on its face, and would clear up all of the gaslighting and lying that is currently occurring in and around the Administration. 

Trump and his surrogates continually claim, "No Collusion, No Obstruction", which is completely false based on the information in the actual report.  To hear that out of Mueller's mouth would be priceless, but the DOJ is trying to stop Mueller form providing answers like that.

Another very important question that should be able to be asked but will likely not be answered because of the DOJ putting a stranglehold on Mueller is, "Why did you choose not to interview the President under oath in person?"  There is likely a very interesting reason why that didn't occur, and finding that out would also be very important. 

So here are my questions:

If the report is so clear in denoting "No Collusion, No Obstruction" as Trump and his surrogates continually claim, why not be fair and allow Mueller to answer the questions asked of him honestly and fully? 

Why stop Mueller form providing answers to important questions like the two I have listed above?

Why claim complete innocence while acting like you are trying to cover up crimes?

The report, for those of us who have read it, is very clear in its depiction of the crimes that have been committed by the President and those surrounding him.  It is very clear to the point that the report in and of itself is enough to impeach multiple presidents.  The Administration and Trump don't want people to know that, and Trump's rock solid base is blind to the truth in every situation, so Trump knows that if he keeps up the rhetoric regularly, he can continue to thrive. 

Let me ask anyone who is on the right who backs Trump the following question.  Take the same Mueller Report and insert Barack Obama into it instead of Trump.  Where would you all stand on the report if that was the case?  If the right was in power and Obama had done the things this report documents, he would have been immediately and swiftly impeached in both houses of Congress.  Anyone who says otherwise can choke on the 30,000 emails crap I haven't stop hearing about since Hillary became a damn civilian. 

This entire situation has changed logical reality and morality in this country to a point no one knows which way is up anymore. 

I am here to say one thing.  Regardless of how the Mueller interview goes, I will continue to be passionate, will continue to fight, will continue to get others to find their passion, and will continue to ensure a record number of people get to the polls in 2020 to oust this horrible and corrupt leader from office. 

Why, because as a parent, I cannot leave this as what I pass on as a country to my children.  They deserve better than what we are giving them.

DUNK


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Truth Matters

If there is one thing I need to keep reminding myself in today's world of political discourse, it is that Truth Matters. At any point in time I can turn on (insert news agency here) News and what I see is vastly different depending upon the news agency I watch.  Why is that?  Every mainstream news organization is bias in some way based upon who runs or owns the news organization.  Don't get me wrong; there are great and impartial journalists and agencies out there, but we are talking in aggregate and not about individuals or one-off agencies. When an issue like immigration is at the forefront of political discourse you can tune into CNN, MSNBC, and FOX and likely get three completely different takes on immigration.  Each news organization tailors their message to speak to what they feel is their viewer base and potential viewer base. That in and of itself is understood by people who follow politics on a regular basis and dig through multiple news sources in ord...

Why does it have to be one way or the other?

I remember a time when I could sit and talk politics and religion with people and have good, productive debates.  The debates were not hateful or one sided, and only rational personal opinions and actual facts were used during the discussions.  They included each person stating their points and making their case, and then each side came to compromises that allowed for solutions that would be good for both parties in the debate.  How did we come to a time in our country's history where we are so vehemently divided on every issue that nothing beneficial to the majority of the American populous or the stability of the country itself can be accomplished?  I am going to state some facts in the next paragraphs.  They may be facts you don't agree with, but they are facts none-the-less.  Those of you on the Right who believe your party's platform has all of the answers to the issues and problems this country faces...you are wrong.  Those of ...