Skip to main content

Robert Mueller Speaks!...

So Robert Mueller addressed the nation today with a speech that should clarify things for everyone.  He laid out volume 1 and the fact that every American should be concerned about Russian Interference in our Democratic Elections. 

He also clearly stated that if his investigation would have found Trump innocent of all obstruction charges, the report would have said so.  He clearly stated that the reason no indictments could be brought of the President is because of the long standing DOJ Policy regarding sitting presidents not being able to be indicted, but that those items can continue to be investigated and handled by other means, which if you haven't noticed is what Congress (at least half of Congress) is trying to do right now. 

After the speech, the President tweeted the following:

"Nothing changes from the Mueller Report.  There was insufficient evidence and therefore, in our Country, a person is innocent.  The case is closed! Thank you."

That tweet is just another attempt at gaslighting the American people.  The facts are simple.  Mueller and his team did not find Trump innocent and could not indict because Trump is a sitting President.

Mueller did, however, clearly lay out many claims of obstruction that came out during the course of the entire investigation; claims that over 1,000 former federal prosecutors have agreed would put any person who is not a sitting President in federal prison for a long time.

Congress, at least the ones who care about our Constitution and the office of the President, are trying to do their job and look into the claims in the Mueller Report.  Congress is performing their constitutional duty of oversight and investigation.  What is Trump doing?  Gaslighting, completely lying, and trying everything in his power to subvert Congress. 

This needs to end.  Check facts and don't trust anything you hear without vetting the information properly.  Don't post things that are untrue.  Demand as a public that Congress is allowed to do their jobs and look into the corruption and obstruction of this Presidency and all that surrounds it. 

These things are happening overtly at this point.  Trump just stood in Japan and sided with Kim Jong-Un again, and then published a horrible tweet just after it blew up in the media stating the following:

"I was actually sticking up for Sleepy Joe Biden while on foreign soil.  Kim Jong Un called him a 'low IQ idiot,' and many other things, whereas I related the quote of Chairman Kim as a much softer 'low IQ individual.' Who could possibly be upset with that?"

Has anyone forgotten about the fact that Kim Jong-Un is a murderous dictator who has killed countless people and who has committed countless human rights violations.  Trump stood in Japan and talked about how the missile tests just performed by Kim didn't bother him at all but bothered others.  Trump said he was sure Kim would stick to their agreement.  THIS IS A MURDEROUS DICTATOR!  Trump treats him like a chum. 

Who does Trump treat the best out of world leaders?  Those who run dictatorships and autocracies, and those who commit horrible human rights violations.  Who does Trump denigrate on a regular basis?  Those who have been America's longest running allies, the press and specific individuals in the press, and anyone else who speaks out against his hate and vitriol. 

Our Country is in a Constitutional Crisis, and if we don't so something to protect the sanctity of the office of President, our country is on a track headed toward disaster. 

This has been your uplifting story of the day, from...

DUNK

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trump and the DOJ Trying to Silence Mueller...

Mueller is set to sit in front of Congress on Wednesday this week and answer questions regarding the Mueller Investigation.  The DOJ, and organization that is supposed to look out for the best interests of America but has recently decided to become Trump's personal Law Firm, has sent correspondence to Mueller about what he can and cannot answer. For instance, you have the question of the 10 documented cases of obstruction in volume 2 of the report.  Mueller made it clear that he was bound by DOJ policy and could not indict a sitting president.  One very important question the Congressional Leadership will likely ask is, "If Donald Trump wasn't the sitting President, would you have indicted him based on the amount of evidence in the report?"  That question in every respect is fair.  You are asking the head of an investigation if they would have indicted someone had an arbitrary roadblock not been in place.  I say arbitrary roadblock because the policy is...

Truth Matters

If there is one thing I need to keep reminding myself in today's world of political discourse, it is that Truth Matters. At any point in time I can turn on (insert news agency here) News and what I see is vastly different depending upon the news agency I watch.  Why is that?  Every mainstream news organization is bias in some way based upon who runs or owns the news organization.  Don't get me wrong; there are great and impartial journalists and agencies out there, but we are talking in aggregate and not about individuals or one-off agencies. When an issue like immigration is at the forefront of political discourse you can tune into CNN, MSNBC, and FOX and likely get three completely different takes on immigration.  Each news organization tailors their message to speak to what they feel is their viewer base and potential viewer base. That in and of itself is understood by people who follow politics on a regular basis and dig through multiple news sources in ord...

Why does it have to be one way or the other?

I remember a time when I could sit and talk politics and religion with people and have good, productive debates.  The debates were not hateful or one sided, and only rational personal opinions and actual facts were used during the discussions.  They included each person stating their points and making their case, and then each side came to compromises that allowed for solutions that would be good for both parties in the debate.  How did we come to a time in our country's history where we are so vehemently divided on every issue that nothing beneficial to the majority of the American populous or the stability of the country itself can be accomplished?  I am going to state some facts in the next paragraphs.  They may be facts you don't agree with, but they are facts none-the-less.  Those of you on the Right who believe your party's platform has all of the answers to the issues and problems this country faces...you are wrong.  Those of ...