Skip to main content

Thank you from the bottom of my heart!

Yesterday marked a milestone for me with my blog.  When I started this journey earlier this year, choosing to spend time researching in the evenings and putting together a blog that was a reflection of my feelings and beliefs that I could put out a few times a week, I didn't expect it to last.  I expected it to become a week long pipe dream that would end abruptly and fail to grow legs of longevity. 

What I found over time, however, is that the blog became a way for me to channel my thoughts, frustrations, and other feelings through my fingers and into words.  It has become a way for me to vent, and for me to present not only opinion but facts to those who don't always look deep enough to find the facts in stories.  If you are a regular reader, you have probably noticed that over time my posts have become more emotional.  I think that is in large part because my emotions on major subjects, especially politics in the United States, have become much stronger. 

Yesterday I published my 50th Blog, and I have a total of 133 compiled pages of blogs to date, just since the end of April.  That is an achievement I never thought I would attain.  In looking at the analytics of my blog, I see that as of today, my blog has been read in 13 countries around the world.  It has been read in the United States, Germany, Poland, Spain, France, Peru, Vietnam, the Philippines, Russia, Ukraine, Indonesia, Canada, and the United Kingdom. 

It's insane to think that my words have essentially travelled the world over the past 3 months.

Now, what am I truly looking to gain from this blog other than it being an outlet for my own thoughts?  It is really about driving thought and discussion in society.  All too often I see arguments online where people are really discussing politics in a way people discuss religion.

What I mean by that is that many of the discussions are rooted in opinion and faith rather than fact.  When you discuss religion, it is all about how you were raised and what you believe and have faith in.  When you discuss politics, the basis for most views should be grounded in facts with some personal emotion. 

I have seen a lack of facts in many of the discussions I have witnessed and been a part of, and I have seen a lack of passion from people who are frankly sick of hearing about politics and have given up caring.  There is a big problem with that from my perspective because it can lead to many negative things in a society that needs nothing but more positivity today. 

People need to stand up and be passionate.  People need to take an extra few minutes every day to not only educate themselves on the news of the day around the world, but to educate themselves on the facts.  Having an opinion that is based on false or misleading information is having a useless opinion.  Educating yourself by spending a bit of time researching the facts of a subject before posting memes or other things on your social media and before jumping into a political discussion to drive a point is important. 

We cannot drive change through emotion alone.  We need to utilize the facts, both historical and current, to form a basis for the changes we feel need to be enacted.  Take the political spectrum today for instance.  There is a very large contingent of voters on the right (about a third) who are so vehemently devoted to Donald Trump that Trump could do just about anything and not lose their votes.  Why is that?  That is because those people were so emotionally upset with their situations before the 2016 campaigns started, and they saw Donald Trump, a man who in their minds spoke what was on his mind, bucked the system, and spoke about making AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!  Trump appealed to their emotional states, and he didn't need facts to bring them to his side.  He simply needed to be different, talk about how the establishment was treating them horribly, and have a catch phrase or two to keep them excited. 

Still today, when I have conversations with some of these devoted Trump supporters, those conversations contain facts coming from me to explain why I feel Trump shouldn't be the President, and only emotion coming from them.  They live in emotion because the facts simply don't support any sort of positive narrative for the future.  The President continues to lie nearly every time he opens his mouth, he continues to denigrate our allies around the world and speak more positively about dictators, he continues to run a campaign to smear the major investigation going on by spreading lies and mistruths, and he continues to use his bully pulpit to denigrate any number of people, countries and businesses.  All the while, that 1/3 of supporters is still there, standing beside him every step of the way, because facts don't matter like they should.

We all need to stand up, demand change, have debates and discussions, choose our candidates wisely (because we have the power to do that), stop voting straight ticket, lift each other up instead of knock each other down, actively listen to each other, and find compromises based both in emotion and fact that will be best for our country moving forward.

This blog is my way of starting the discussion, and my way of hopefully touching a handful of people out there who will read it and become more active in politics and become more passionate about being involved and become more grounded in the facts rather than simply emotion. 

People should be talking, and I hope in some small way my blog will have an impact on at least one person, if not more.  I will continue on posting blogs on a regular basis, and will continue on being so very grateful that those of you out there who regularly read my blog, or are reading it for the first time today, are offering my words a bit of time in your lives.  I am grateful for that and thank you all for the time you have taken to read my posts.

Thank you, and I look forward to posting a similar message after my 100th blog milestone.

DUNK

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trump and the DOJ Trying to Silence Mueller...

Mueller is set to sit in front of Congress on Wednesday this week and answer questions regarding the Mueller Investigation.  The DOJ, and organization that is supposed to look out for the best interests of America but has recently decided to become Trump's personal Law Firm, has sent correspondence to Mueller about what he can and cannot answer. For instance, you have the question of the 10 documented cases of obstruction in volume 2 of the report.  Mueller made it clear that he was bound by DOJ policy and could not indict a sitting president.  One very important question the Congressional Leadership will likely ask is, "If Donald Trump wasn't the sitting President, would you have indicted him based on the amount of evidence in the report?"  That question in every respect is fair.  You are asking the head of an investigation if they would have indicted someone had an arbitrary roadblock not been in place.  I say arbitrary roadblock because the policy is...

Truth Matters

If there is one thing I need to keep reminding myself in today's world of political discourse, it is that Truth Matters. At any point in time I can turn on (insert news agency here) News and what I see is vastly different depending upon the news agency I watch.  Why is that?  Every mainstream news organization is bias in some way based upon who runs or owns the news organization.  Don't get me wrong; there are great and impartial journalists and agencies out there, but we are talking in aggregate and not about individuals or one-off agencies. When an issue like immigration is at the forefront of political discourse you can tune into CNN, MSNBC, and FOX and likely get three completely different takes on immigration.  Each news organization tailors their message to speak to what they feel is their viewer base and potential viewer base. That in and of itself is understood by people who follow politics on a regular basis and dig through multiple news sources in ord...

Why does it have to be one way or the other?

I remember a time when I could sit and talk politics and religion with people and have good, productive debates.  The debates were not hateful or one sided, and only rational personal opinions and actual facts were used during the discussions.  They included each person stating their points and making their case, and then each side came to compromises that allowed for solutions that would be good for both parties in the debate.  How did we come to a time in our country's history where we are so vehemently divided on every issue that nothing beneficial to the majority of the American populous or the stability of the country itself can be accomplished?  I am going to state some facts in the next paragraphs.  They may be facts you don't agree with, but they are facts none-the-less.  Those of you on the Right who believe your party's platform has all of the answers to the issues and problems this country faces...you are wrong.  Those of ...