Skip to main content

Enemy of The People

I belly laughed when the President reached out to the Media and made a formal request for them to live stream his speech that is happening on Tuesday night from the Oval Office.

Trump has continually bashed the media at every turn.  He has called the media, "The Enemy of the People" too many times to count.  That term has roots in a history I truly hope Trump is not aware of, because if he is, his use of the term is even worse.

The phrase dates back to Roman times, but came into more regular use during the French Revolution.  Ennemi du peuple was used to refer to those who disagreed with the new French government during the Reign of Terror, a period during which thousands of revolutionaries were executed by guillotine.

It's next very obvious use was by the Nazis, during the Third Reich's rule in Germany.  Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels referred to Jews as "A sworn enemy of the German people".

The term gained its widest use by Joseph Stalin during the early years of the Soviet Union.  Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin used the term vrag naroda (enemy of the nation/people) to refer to those who disagreed with the ideologies pushed forth by the Bolshevik government and, later, adopted by the newly formed Soviet Union.

The phrase lost popularity in the 1950s when Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev came into power and denounced Lenin and Stalin's use of the term to refer to anyone who disagreed with the leaders.  In a speech to the Soviet Communist Party, Khrushchev stated, "The formula enemy of the people was specifically introduced for the purpose of physically annihilating such individuals."

In more recent years, Venezuela's Hugo Chavez also called political dissenters, "enemies of the homeland."

'Enemy of the People' is not a phrase rooted in anything historically good.  It is a phrase that should never be spoken about the Free Press in the United States, which is an institution that helps to define our freedoms and separate us from other countries where the Press is not free and is run by the State.

Now, having said that, the Trump Administration put in a formal request to have "The Press" live stream his speech in the Oval Office Tuesday night.  Why would you use who you claim to be the Enemy of the People to help you spread your rhetoric?

The fact is that the Press is not the Enemy of the People.  The Press, in large part, is reporting the facts...facts of which are contrary to what comes out of the President's mouth because of how much and how often he lies.  He can't stand to be covered negatively, but everything he says and does is negative, so the coverage is of course negative.  The Press is going to fact check the things he says and does, and for good reason.

Trump doesn't deserve the Press' support tonight; not after what he has done and said to them.  Look at the Jim Acosta ordeal.  He is overstepping his bounds and saying things that are entirely too Dictator Like in nature.

He needs to be called out for his continued lies and misdirection, and it needs to happen NOW.

DUNK

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trump and the DOJ Trying to Silence Mueller...

Mueller is set to sit in front of Congress on Wednesday this week and answer questions regarding the Mueller Investigation.  The DOJ, and organization that is supposed to look out for the best interests of America but has recently decided to become Trump's personal Law Firm, has sent correspondence to Mueller about what he can and cannot answer. For instance, you have the question of the 10 documented cases of obstruction in volume 2 of the report.  Mueller made it clear that he was bound by DOJ policy and could not indict a sitting president.  One very important question the Congressional Leadership will likely ask is, "If Donald Trump wasn't the sitting President, would you have indicted him based on the amount of evidence in the report?"  That question in every respect is fair.  You are asking the head of an investigation if they would have indicted someone had an arbitrary roadblock not been in place.  I say arbitrary roadblock because the policy is...

Electoral College

I have seen a ton of talk about the Electoral College in recent months.  The majority of Americans feel that going to a Direct Popular Vote like the rest of the world is the way to go.  Those on the Right seem to be completely against abolishing the Electoral College.  The question is why? The most common argument given is that we shouldn't let voters in all the big cities decide who is in office for the entire country, and that with Direct Popular Vote, those people who live in rural communities also get a say.  When you break down that argument, you quickly find all the holes that exist within it.  Let's start by talking about one other thing that is completely unfair in our current political system.  Let's look at the Senate. In the Senate, each State elects 2 Senators to go to Congress in Washington D.C.  Sounds fair right? Let's look at the most populous states and least populous states and how many people in each state Senators repres...

Truth Matters

If there is one thing I need to keep reminding myself in today's world of political discourse, it is that Truth Matters. At any point in time I can turn on (insert news agency here) News and what I see is vastly different depending upon the news agency I watch.  Why is that?  Every mainstream news organization is bias in some way based upon who runs or owns the news organization.  Don't get me wrong; there are great and impartial journalists and agencies out there, but we are talking in aggregate and not about individuals or one-off agencies. When an issue like immigration is at the forefront of political discourse you can tune into CNN, MSNBC, and FOX and likely get three completely different takes on immigration.  Each news organization tailors their message to speak to what they feel is their viewer base and potential viewer base. That in and of itself is understood by people who follow politics on a regular basis and dig through multiple news sources in ord...