Skip to main content

Who am I Politically?

Over the past week I have had 5 separate people contact me through direct messaging or ask directly on a thread where I fall within the political spectrum.  I feel it important to inform people who do read my blogs where I stand, so that is what this blog is going to be about. 

First, I am not a Republican, Democrat, or Independent.  I am a Centerist. 

Centerists don't have party lines.  They believe that solutions are more important than the bias.  Centerism is a political ideology based on reason and pragmatism considerate of short and long term thinking.  Centerism is not defined by compromise or moderation, but is considerate of them.  It is about achieving common sense solutions that appropriately address current and future needs, support the public trust, and serve the common good with consideration of risk and capacity in context of these needs. 

Centerists should be motivated by the strength of their reasoning and the wisdom to know that convictions are merely perspectives based on current understanding and circumstance; and that learning is key to future solutions.

You aren't just to be honest, but honorable.  Centerists are Americans who are tired of being misled by politicians who handily word craft their way in and out of positions and rely on popularity polls to figure out what they need to say next, in order to pander to some special interest, or get more votes. 

What Centerists are NOT is moderate.  Moderation has more in kind with compromise than working toward the best solution.  The goal is not compromise in and of itself, but rather pragmatism based on reasonable considerations, short and long term.  Decisions and policies based on the best answer, not simply based on the compromise between two individually flawed perspectives that are ideologically opposed.  It is compromise mixed with reason to come closer to the most pragmatic solution or policy. 

I do not believe in fringe politics.  I don't feel that any answer to any of the issues we see in America is to the Far Right or Far Left.  The answers all lie somewhere in the middle, middle-right, and middle-left, depending upon the issue.  I am absolutely not in any way someone who promotes voting straight ticket in elections, because I don't believe that every Democrat or every Republican is the answer. 

I believe people should do their research on every candidate prior to going to vote, and vote for the candidates with the values (or apparent values) and track records that fall closest in support to what is best for the majority of the American populous and the current and future stability of the United States.

I do believe, however, in straight ticket voting this year.  I have followed this administration for a long time now, watched the actions they have taken, the lies they have told, and the misdirection campaigns to cover up any controversies they are facing on a daily basis.  I have watched the EPA regulations be dismantled, the absolute disrespect and attempts to discredit investigations that are ongoing and completely reasonable and necessary, the denigration of people and institutions, racist and xenophobic comments, and so much more. 

But what bothers me the most is that Congress, controlled by the Republicans at this point, has done nothing, absolutely nothing, to step in and do something about it.  This year, unlike any other year I have ever voted, I will be voting in the #BlueWave for Congressional Candidates.  Why?  I believe the only way to stop the direction things are going in Washington right now is to put the Democratic Party in charge of Congress in order to drive accountability that hasn't been present in the past year-and-a-half. 

What are my beliefs on the issues including gun legislation, abortion, death penalty and the other hot button issues?

Well, that will be in my next Blog!

Until Next Time

DUNK

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trump and the DOJ Trying to Silence Mueller...

Mueller is set to sit in front of Congress on Wednesday this week and answer questions regarding the Mueller Investigation.  The DOJ, and organization that is supposed to look out for the best interests of America but has recently decided to become Trump's personal Law Firm, has sent correspondence to Mueller about what he can and cannot answer. For instance, you have the question of the 10 documented cases of obstruction in volume 2 of the report.  Mueller made it clear that he was bound by DOJ policy and could not indict a sitting president.  One very important question the Congressional Leadership will likely ask is, "If Donald Trump wasn't the sitting President, would you have indicted him based on the amount of evidence in the report?"  That question in every respect is fair.  You are asking the head of an investigation if they would have indicted someone had an arbitrary roadblock not been in place.  I say arbitrary roadblock because the policy is...

Truth Matters

If there is one thing I need to keep reminding myself in today's world of political discourse, it is that Truth Matters. At any point in time I can turn on (insert news agency here) News and what I see is vastly different depending upon the news agency I watch.  Why is that?  Every mainstream news organization is bias in some way based upon who runs or owns the news organization.  Don't get me wrong; there are great and impartial journalists and agencies out there, but we are talking in aggregate and not about individuals or one-off agencies. When an issue like immigration is at the forefront of political discourse you can tune into CNN, MSNBC, and FOX and likely get three completely different takes on immigration.  Each news organization tailors their message to speak to what they feel is their viewer base and potential viewer base. That in and of itself is understood by people who follow politics on a regular basis and dig through multiple news sources in ord...

Why does it have to be one way or the other?

I remember a time when I could sit and talk politics and religion with people and have good, productive debates.  The debates were not hateful or one sided, and only rational personal opinions and actual facts were used during the discussions.  They included each person stating their points and making their case, and then each side came to compromises that allowed for solutions that would be good for both parties in the debate.  How did we come to a time in our country's history where we are so vehemently divided on every issue that nothing beneficial to the majority of the American populous or the stability of the country itself can be accomplished?  I am going to state some facts in the next paragraphs.  They may be facts you don't agree with, but they are facts none-the-less.  Those of you on the Right who believe your party's platform has all of the answers to the issues and problems this country faces...you are wrong.  Those of ...